🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – seems like it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive

According to a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning because partisan disputes over tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. How our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would need payments from workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee making average wages pays about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you contrast that with what the typical US resident spends. I know dozens of businesses who are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that with comprehensive systems, those payments include pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection along with funding medical services. When including those costs compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. And, like many federal military, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the program could be managed by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would make administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complex (and ineffective) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage by our employees – contrasted with the current system where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for companies as we no longer would be privy to our employees' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes required, would still be a better and less expensive approach both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places well below many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances could be that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.