🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in the city, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win while failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the system frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of votes added later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible where yesterday went somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained half a million supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, tenants and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president previously went for the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to get over half. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it so then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. The independent held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I think there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there was a little resistance. But no, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if existed major surprises on this one, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that each urban center in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.